The Supreme Court has sternly reprimanded the Punjab government for its failure to address the persistent issue of stubble burning, a major contributor to the alarming levels of air pollution in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR). This article delves into the court’s remarks, the significance of Haryana’s approach, and the urgent need for effective measures to combat stubble burning.

Supreme Court’s Rebuke

The apex court’s dissatisfaction with the Punjab government’s handling of stubble burning is evident in its recent rebuke. Drawing a comparison with Haryana, the court emphasized that the latter has been more successful in curbing this detrimental practice. Noting Haryana’s initiatives, including machinery subsidies for in-situ management of crop residue and awareness campaigns, the court urged Punjab to follow suit.

Court’s Directive to Punjab

In a decisive move, the Supreme Court has instructed the Punjab government to submit a comprehensive action plan to curb stubble burning within four weeks. The next hearing on this critical matter is scheduled for December 9, signifying the urgency and seriousness with which the court views the issue.

Stubble Burning: A Persistent Menace

Stubble burning, the practice of setting fire to crop residue after harvesting, is a prevalent method in Punjab and Haryana due to its quick and cost-effective nature. However, this practice releases harmful pollutants like PM2.5 and PM10, contributing significantly to air pollution. The repercussions include respiratory problems, heart disease, and premature death.

Alternatives to Stubble Burning

Addressing the problem of stubble burning requires viable alternatives. In-situ management of crop residue, incorporating machinery to till the residue into the soil, is a proven method. Additionally, the government advocates the use of bio-decomposers, which break down crop residue into organic matter.

Punjab Government’s Efforts

While the Punjab government has taken steps such as subsidizing machinery for in-situ residue management and running awareness campaigns, it faces criticism for perceived inadequacies. The complexity of the issue demands more robust and sustainable solutions.

Supreme Court’s Active Role

The Supreme Court’s involvement in curbing stubble burning dates back to 2015, when it initially banned the practice. Despite the ban, full implementation has remained a challenge. The court has established a monitoring committee to oversee the ban’s implementation and has consistently pushed for more effective measures.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s recent admonishment underscores the growing frustration over the persistent problem of stubble burning. The Punjab government is urged to take more impactful measures to address this pressing issue. While the complexity of stubble burning necessitates thoughtful solutions, the court’s directive emphasizes the need for a more determined effort to find effective and sustainable resolutions.

FAQs

1. Why did the Supreme Court rebuke the Punjab government regarding stubble burning?

• The Supreme Court expressed dissatisfaction with the Punjab government’s handling of stubble burning, urging more effective measures.

2. What steps has Haryana taken to control stubble burning?

• Haryana’s initiatives include providing subsidies on machinery for in-situ residue management and conducting awareness campaigns.

3. What alternatives does the government endorse instead of stubble burning?

• Viable alternatives include in-situ management of crop residue and the use of bio-decomposers to break down residue into organic matter.

4. What is the significance of the Supreme Court’s directive to Punjab?

• The court has instructed the Punjab government to submit a detailed action plan to curb stubble burning within four weeks, highlighting the urgency of the matter.

5. How has the Supreme Court been involved in addressing stubble burning?

• The Supreme Court has actively taken steps, including setting up a monitoring committee, to oversee the ban on stubble burning since 2015.